Guides · Who holds the punch

Who performs the surgery,
under each country's rules.

Turkey's 2023 hair-transplant regulation reserves exactly one stage of the operation to a physician (the channel-opening incisions) and permits a single certified physician to be responsible for as many as five application rooms at the same time. Extraction and implantation, the thousands of individual decisions that consume most of the session, may lawfully be performed by certificated non-physician health personnel working under that physician's supervision. None of this is hidden or alleged: it is the text of the Official Gazette, quoted below. Whether it matters to you depends on how much of the outcome you believe rests on those thousands of decisions rather than on the plan.

The division of labour

What a technician does. What a surgeon does.

In a delegated model an assistant performs the extraction (removing individual grafts with a punch) and the implantation (placing them into recipient sites) across the session, sometimes for hours at a time and often across several assistants per case. The physician makes the recipient-site incisions, designs the hairline, and supervises, without personally extracting or placing most of the grafts. Turkey's regulation maps onto that division almost exactly, which is why it is worth reading rather than paraphrasing: it tells you what the physician is legally required to do, and by omission, everything they are not.

Where each model is legal

Each country's rule, quoted from the primary source.

Two jurisdictions have been read in the original. The rest are blank on purpose: there is no third category on this table.

Jurisdiction Instrument What it actually says
Turkey Turkey’s hair-transplant units regulation, Official Gazette 06.05.2023 Delegation is lawful and licensed. Article 9(3) reserves only the channel-opening (incision) stage to a physician holding a hair-transplant practitioner certificate; extraction and implantation may be performed by certificated non-physician health personnel (nurses, health officers, emergency and anaesthesia technicians) working under that physician’s supervision (9(4)). Article 9(6) permits one certified physician to be responsible for up to five application rooms at once, each staffed by at least two certificated assistants. Anyone holding neither certificate may not perform hair transplantation at all (11(2)(b)).
Turkey: the medical-tourism carve-out Same regulation, article 10(3) The patient record must name every member of the operating team and carry photographs taken before the procedure and within the first 72 hours. The six-month follow-up photograph required of domestic patients is expressly not required for patients who arrive under health tourism. The follow-up evidence trail is shorter for you than it is for a local.
Korea Medical Service Act §27(1) Delegation is not licensed here, it is prohibited. Non-licensed persons may not perform medical practice, and a licensed practitioner may not perform practice outside their own licence. Hair transplant surgery performed by a nursing assistant is treated as exceeding the scope of nursing assistance and therefore as unlicensed medical practice, even where a physician supervises. The difference between Korea and Turkey on this row is statutory, not cultural.
Japan Medical Practitioners Act §17 · Nurses Act §5, §37 (read 2026-07-29) Medicine is reserved to physicians, and nurses may perform delegated assistance in treatment only under a physician’s instruction. No Japanese statute or ministry notice names hair-transplant steps specifically. We say that plainly rather than inferring more. What fills the gap is the leading Tokyo clinic’s own FAQ: the physician performs anaesthesia, donor harvesting and the recipient slits, and graft dissection and implantation are done mainly by nurses following the physician’s instructions. Lawful delegation, printed by the clinic itself.
Thailand Medical Profession Act B.E. 2525 §4, §26 · Sanatorium Act B.E. 2541 §34(1) (read 2026-07-29) The reserved definition of medicine expressly includes surgical acts for cosmetic purposes, so only a licensed physician may perform them, and the clinic operator carries criminal liability, up to two years, for permitting anyone non-licensed to practise on the premises. No Thai instrument names hair transplantation specifically; this is the general surgical-act reservation, and we claim only that.
India NMC EMRB notice R-13014/18/2022-Ethics, 2022-09-20 · Delhi HC, Azhar Rasheed v. State NCT of Delhi, W.P.(CRL) 115/2022 The one market here where the regulator was forced to write the rule down after deaths. The National Medical Commission’s notice states that any skin incision (incising the FUE graft, excising the strip, creating recipient sites) is a surgical procedure that must be performed by a Registered Medical Practitioner, with technicians restricted to supervised, non-incision tasks; the Delhi High Court called salon transplants delegated to technicians complete medical malpractice. The nuance: India’s own society guideline still permits technicians to implant grafts into premade slits, so the incision rule and “the doctor does your transplant” are not the same sentence.
China Medical Aesthetics Services Administrative Measures §11, §18 · the 2009 graded-catalog notice (read 2026-07-29) Physician responsibility, not surgeon-only. Hair transplantation is a Level-1 cosmetic-surgery item, and the governing rule requires it to be performed by, or under the guidance of, a qualified attending physician. No Chinese law allocates extraction versus implantation between surgeon and staff; the only text that reserves extraction to the lead surgeon while letting qualified nurses implant is a voluntary industry standard drafted with the chains it governs. The largest chain’s own listing prospectus names anaesthesia, extraction and incision as steps its physicians perform personally; implantation is not on that list, and the group employs roughly five nurses per doctor.

A note on fairness to Turkey: before May 2023 there was no dedicated instrument at all, and the assistant role was governed only by general medical law. The regulation quoted above tightened that: it created certificates, room standards, named-team record-keeping, annual inspection, and fines of one to three per cent of the previous month's gross revenue for non-compliance. Turkey regulated this sooner and more specifically than anywhere else we looked. The five-rooms-per-physician figure is not a loophole someone found; it is the considered position of the regulator, published.

What the evidence says

What delegation changes: variance and accountability.

There is no strong published evidence that technician-performed extraction produces worse outcomes on average. The documented differences are in variance and in accountability: who is answerable when a session goes wrong, and whether that person was ever named to you. We are stating this plainly because overstating it would be the same kind of unsupported claim we are asking you not to accept from anyone else.

The International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery runs a campaign on this specific question (Fight the FIGHT, for fraudulent, illicit and global hair transplants) aimed at unlicensed non-physicians performing hair restoration surgery. The problems its members report seeing in those patients are scarring, unnatural hairlines, poor growth, wrong hair direction, depleted donor areas and infection. Read that carefully: it is a statement about unlicensed practice, which Turkey's regulation also prohibits. It is not evidence against the licensed, certificated delegation the regulation permits, and we are not going to present it as though it were.

What we do, and what it costs you

The Korean model: one named surgeon.

The surgeon named in your plan performs your extraction and implantation personally. See how we check that. In Korea that is not a premium feature we invented, it is the only lawful way to do it, and the cost of it shows up in every price row on this site: we are between two and four times the Istanbul package, and roughly double the Chinese chain average. If certificated delegation under supervision is acceptable to you, those markets are the rational choice and we will not pretend otherwise. See the full comparison.